Sunday, October 01, 2006

Fw: Toward understanding the Double Slit Experiment, pt. 1


----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Walker" <wincowalker@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: Toward understanding the Double Slit Experiment, pt. 1

> Some ideas :
>
> Do photons need to be necessarily single or in some numbers, can't they be
> fractional?
>
> An atom or such structure can exist without being in a state of motion.
But
> can a photon exist without being in a state of travel.
> So, there is fundamental difference between such entities which needs to
be
> considered while dealing with them.
>
> An unified theory of matter - energy continuum is needed to be visualized
> and experimented upon.
>
> Any proposals?
>
> Thomas Walker
>
> "Y.Porat" <maporat@012.net.il> wrote in message
> news:1155635495.017057.109480@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Ralph Hertle wrote:
> > > Re: Toward understanding the Double Slit Experiment, pt. 1
> > > alt.astronomy
> > > sci.physics.relativity
> > > alt.sci.physics
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Y.Porat wrote:
> > >
> > > [....]
> > >
> > > > -------------------------------
> > > > Dear Mr Kinane
> > > >
> > > > you are asking about entring one photon!!
> > > >
> > > > while me and apparently you as well
> > > > do not know
> > > > what is** one** photon !!!
> > > > what is a single photon definition??
> > > >
> > > > before starting walking we have to learn how to crawl
> > > > ist that ??
> > > >
> > > > TIA
> > > > Y.Porat
> > > > --------------------------------
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Y. Porat:
> > >
> > > If questions are a measure of intelligence then you are a genius.
> > >
> > > The religionist creationists and the Doppler-Hubble creationists,
> > > and maybe other sorts of expansionist creationists, base all their
> > > conclusions either upon the Bible or upon the Apparent Red Shift
> > > of EM spectral light frequencies.
> > >
> > > They adamantly refuse to consider the interaction of photons
> > > and electrons regarding interactions and velocity differentials.
> > >
> > > They are totally intellectually closed on that topic. By that they
> > > refuse to gain information regarding, not the origin of the
> > > universe, but its cause insofar as the identity and properties
> > > of the existents that continue to exist, however changed due
> > > to their properties or potentials.
> > >
> > > What is more, they refuse to accept that the entity that is the
> > > photon has any identity whatsoever, albeit, except for a few
> > > magnificently discovered properties of photons, e.g., refraction
> > > and gravitational influences, and more.
> > >
> > > They actually don't have any idea at all about what the photon is,
> > > and yet they make stupendous pronouncements regarding
> > > suppositions of the assumed causes of the universe.
> > >
> > > They don't even know what the properties of gravity existents
> > > are, much less what the substance of matter or energy is.
> > >
> > > They are intellectually and factually bankrupt.
> > >
> > > More so, they have not opened their eyes to see that the
> > > universe exists continually, that is everything that exists, - e.g.,
> > > would you believe, without start, interruption, or end, continually.
> > > The universe simply continues to exist and its plural existents to
> > > function according to their natural properties.
> > >
> > > You said it right.
> > >
> > > Scientists, especially astronomer creationist cosmologist
> > > physicists, have no clue whatsoever what a photon is.
> > >
> > > They posture madly about the supposed original
> > > discontinuities of the universe, qua their assumed
> > > creationism, this or that nothingness, let alone about what
> > > universal termination is, and still they don't even know what
> > > a photon is.
> > >
> > > Or any of the existing existents of existence.
> > >
> > > The gentleman has asked the question.
> > >
> > > What is the photon?
> > >
> > > Ralph Hertle
> > ----------------
> > Thank you Ralph
> >
> > now to be more precise the key question is:
> >
> > WHAT IS THE **QUANTITATIVE DEFINITION OF A SINGLE PHOTON**??!!
> >
> > it sems that people speak about a 'single photon' whithout knowing
> > about aht they are talking
> > without that definition all the talking about a single photon is
> > nonsense physics
> >
> > so ??? waht is the above definition????
> > does a photon that is emmited from Radium is the same as that form
> > say nickel evn if the frequescy of them are the same
> > to be even more specific :
> >
> > is the **duration of emittance** is the same in radion 'single photon'
> > as in say Kalium 'single photon ' ????!!!!
> >
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
> > --------------
> >
>
>

No comments:

Post a Comment